Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(5)2024 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592253

ABSTRACT

Background: With the increasing popularity of elective induction after 39 + 0 weeks, the question of whether induction of labor (IOL) is safe in women with isolated polyhydramnios has become more relevant. We aimed to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes associated with IOL among women with and without isolated polyhydramnios. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort that included women who underwent induction of labor at term. The study compared women who underwent IOL due to isolated polyhydramnios to low-risk women who underwent elective IOL due to gestational age only. The main outcome measure was a composite adverse maternal outcome, while the secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results: During the study period, 1004 women underwent IOL at term and met inclusion and exclusion criteria; 162 had isolated polyhydramnios, and 842 had a normal amount of amniotic fluid. Women who had isolated polyhydramnios had higher rates of the composite adverse maternal outcome (28.7% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.02), prolonged hospital stay, perineal tear grade 3/4, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Multivariate analyses revealed that among women with IOL, polyhydramnios was significantly associated with adverse composite maternal outcome [aOR 1.98 (1.27-3.10), p < 0.01]. Conclusions: IOL in women with isolated polyhydramnios at term was associated with worse perinatal outcomes compared to low-risk women who underwent elective IOL. Our findings suggest that the management of women with polyhydramnios cannot be extrapolated from studies of low-risk populations and that clinical decision-making should take into account the individual patient's risk factors and preferences.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523565

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of ChatGPT responses to common issues in obstetrics and assess its ability to provide reliable responses to pregnant individuals. The study aimed to examine the responses based on expert opinions using predetermined criteria, including "accuracy," "completeness," and "safety." METHODS: We curated 15 common and potentially clinically significant questions that pregnant women are asking. Two native English-speaking women were asked to reframe the questions in their own words, and we employed the ChatGPT language model to generate responses to the questions. To evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and safety of the ChatGPT's generated responses, we developed a questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5 that obstetrics and gynecology experts from different countries were invited to rate accordingly. The ratings were analyzed to evaluate the average level of agreement and percentage of positive ratings (≥4) for each criterion. RESULTS: Of the 42 experts invited, 20 responded to the questionnaire. The combined score for all responses yielded a mean rating of 4, with 75% of responses receiving a positive rating (≥4). While examining specific criteria, the ChatGPT responses were better for the accuracy criterion, with a mean rating of 4.2 and 80% of the questions received a positive rating. The responses scored less for the completeness criterion, with a mean rating of 3.8 and 46.7% of questions received a positive rating. For safety, the mean rating was 3.9 and 53.3% of questions received a positive rating. There was no response with an average negative rating below three. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates promising results regarding potential use of ChatGPT's in providing accurate responses to obstetric clinical questions posed by pregnant women. However, it is crucial to exercise caution when addressing inquiries concerning the safety of the fetus or the mother.

3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101326, 2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increased risk for preterm birth has been observed among individuals with a previous second stage cesarean delivery when compared with those with a previous vaginal delivery. One mechanism that may contribute to the increased risk for preterm birth following a second stage cesarean delivery is the increased risk for cervical injury because of extension of the uterine incision (hysterotomy) into the cervix. The contribution of hysterotomy extension to the rate of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy has not been investigated and may shed light on the mechanism underlying the observed relationship between the mode of delivery and subsequent preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the association between unintended hysterotomy extension and preterm birth in a subsequent delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic perinatal data collected from 2 university-affiliated obstetrical centers. The study included patients with a primary cesarean delivery of a term, singleton live birth and a subsequent singleton birth in the same catchment (2005-2021). The primary outcome was subsequent preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation; secondary outcomes included subsequent preterm birth at <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation. We assessed crude and adjusted associations between unintended hysterotomy extensions and subsequent preterm birth with log binomial regression models using rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted models included several characteristics of the primary cesarean delivery such as maternal age, length of active labor, indication for cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, and maternal comorbidity. RESULTS: A total 4797 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of unintended hysterotomy extension in the primary cesarean delivery was 6.0% and the total rate of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was 4.8%. Patients with an unintended hysterotomy extension were more likely to have a longer duration of active labor, chorioamnionitis, failed vacuum delivery attempt, second stage cesarean delivery, and persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head in the primary cesarean delivery and higher rates of smoking in the subsequent pregnancy. Multivariable analyses that controlled for several confounders showed that a history of hysterotomy extension was not associated with a higher risk for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.47), but it was associated with preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.42). CONCLUSION: Patients with a uterine incision extension have a 2.5 times higher rate of preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation when compared with patients who did not have this injury. This association was not observed for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation. Future research should aim to replicate our analyses with incorporation of additional data to minimize the potential for residual confounding.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235842

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Second-stage cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with subsequent preterm birth (PTB). It has been suggested that an increased risk of PTB after second-stage cesarean delivery could be linked to a higher chance of cervical injury due to the extension of the uterine incision. Previous studies have shown that reverse breech extraction is associated with lower rates of uterine incision extensions compared to the "push" method. We aimed to investigate the association between the method of fetal extraction during second-stage CD and the rate of spontaneous PTB (sPTB), as well as other maternal and neonatal outcomes during the subsequent pregnancy. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included women in their first subsequent singleton delivery following a second-stage CD between 2004 and 2021. The main exposure of interest was the method of fetal extraction in the index CD ("push" method vs. reverse breech extraction). The primary outcome of this study was sPTB <37 weeks in the subsequent pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were overall PTB, trial of labor, and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 2969 index CD during second stage were performed, of those 583 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 234 (40.1%) had fetal extraction using the reverse breech extraction method, while 349 (59.9%) had the "push" method for extraction. In univariate analysis, women in those two groups had statistically similar rates of sPTB (3.7% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.19) and overall PTB (<37, <34 and <32 weeks), as well as other maternal, neonatal, and trial of labor outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariate analyses with an adjusted OR of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.43-3.71) for sPTB. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous second-stage CD, no significant difference was observed in PTB rates in the subsequent pregnancies following the "push" method compared to the reverse breech extraction method.

5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37675895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between a topical hemostatic agent used at the time of cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy in whom a topical hemostatic agent was placed during the primary cesarean delivery were compared with patients in whom no such agent was placed. We assessed the uterine scar disruption rate after the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcomes. Univariate analyses were followed by multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: During the study period, 7199 women underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study; 430 (6.0%) had prior use of a hemostatic agent, 6769 (94.0%) did not. In univariate analysis, a history of topical hemostatic agent use was not found to be significantly associated with uterine scar rupture, dehiscence, or failed trial of labor. This was also confirmed on multivariate analysis for uterine rupture (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 0.66-5.54; P = 0.23), dehiscence of uterine scar (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 0.56-4.68; P = 0.37), and TOLAC failure (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48; P = 0.61). CONCLUSION: A history of hemostatic agent use is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption after subsequent TOLAC. Further prospective studies in other settings are needed to strengthen these findings.

6.
J Clin Med ; 12(17)2023 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37685763

ABSTRACT

The aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to examine the impact of maternal age on perinatal outcomes in multiparas, stratified according to maternal age in one- and two-year increments. The analysis involved 302,484 multiparas who delivered between the years 2003 and 2021 in four university-affiliated obstetrics departments. Maternal age was considered both as a continuous variable and in two-year intervals, as compared with a comparison group of parturients aged 25-30 years. The study focused on cesarean delivery and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission as primary outcomes. The findings revealed that cesarean delivery rates increased as maternal age advanced, with rates ranging from 6.7% among 25-30 year olds, rising continuously from 13.5% to 19.9% between the age strata of 31 and 42, to exceeding 20% among those aged ≥ 43 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25-30 year old group). Similarly, NICU admission rates rose from 2.7% in the comparison group to 6% in parturients aged 45-46 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25-30 year old group). The study highlights the association between incrementally advanced maternal age and increased rates of maternal and neonatal complications, necessitating global awareness of these implications for family planning decisions and maternal care.

8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(10): 101121, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37558127

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Second-stage cesarean delivery is associated with subsequent preterm delivery. Failed vacuum-assisted delivery is a subgroup of second-stage cesarean delivery in which the fetal head is engaged deeper in the pelvis and, thus, is associated with an increased risk of short-term maternal complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women at their subsequent delivery after a second-stage cesarean delivery with failed vacuum-assisted extraction vs after a second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted extraction. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all women in their subsequent pregnancy after a second-stage cesarean delivery who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers (n=4) in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who had second-stage cesarean delivery after a failed vacuum-assisted delivery were compared with women who had second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were vaginal birth rate and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 1313 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 215 (16.4%) had a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery at the previous delivery and 1098 (83.6%) did not. In univariate analysis, women with previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery had similar preterm delivery rates (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation), a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery rates, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy. However, multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery is associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.79; P=.02), but not with preterm delivery at <34 or <32 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous second-stage cesarean delivery, previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation in the subsequent birth.


Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects
9.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 202: 110813, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37392938

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate whether women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the diagnostic 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are at an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study of women with twin gestation, comparing four groups: (1) normal 50-g screening, (2) normal 100-g 3-hour OGTT, (3) one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT, and (4) GDM. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for maternal age, gravidity, parity, previous CDs, fertility treatments, smoking, obesity and chorionicity were used. RESULTS: The study included 2,597 women with twin gestations, of which 79.7% had a normal screen, and 6.2% had one abnormal value on the OGTT. In adjusted analyses, women with one abnormal value were found to have higher rates of preterm delivery < 32 weeks, large for gestational age neonates, and composite neonatal morbidity of at least one fetus, however, similar maternal outcomes as those with a normal screen. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT are at an increased risk of unfavorable neonatal outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariable logistic regressions. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions such as nutritional counseling, blood glucose monitoring, and treatment with diet and medication would improve perinatal outcomes in this population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy Outcome
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(7): 100946, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While it is widely acknowledged that pregnancy losses can lead to negative outcomes for both mothers and fetuses, there is limited information available on the specific levels of risk associated with each additional pregnancy loss. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of number of previous pregnancy losses among nulliparous women on maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who delivered at our medical centers and had varying numbers of previous pregnancy losses were compared with women who had no previous pregnancy loss. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery rate at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 97,904 nulliparous women met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those women, 84,245 (86%) had no previous pregnancy losses (reference group), 10,724 (11%) had 1 previous pregnancy loss, 2150 (2.2%) had 2 previous pregnancy losses, 516 (0.5%) had 3 previous pregnancy losses, 160 (0.2%) had 4 previous pregnancy losses, and 99 (0.1%) had ≥5 previous pregnancy losses. Women who had previous pregnancy losses had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus (pregestational and gestational), unplanned cesarean delivery, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and neonatal hypoglycemia. The risks of preterm delivery and most other adverse obstetrical outcomes correlated with the number of previous pregnancy losses. Multivariate analyses showed that each previous pregnancy loss was associated with an additional, significant, increased risk of preterm delivery of 14% at <37 weeks of gestation, 37% at <34 weeks of gestation, 45% at <32 weeks of gestation, and 77% at <28 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: A history of previous pregnancy losses increased the risk of preterm delivery and other perinatal outcomes in a dose-dependent manner. To minimize perinatal complications, obstetricians should be aware of the risks and complications in this unique population, consider close monitoring of the cervical length, and maintain high vigilance in case of complications with special attention to other potentially modifiable risks.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Cesarean Section , Pregnancy, Multiple
11.
J Clin Med ; 12(7)2023 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37048660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with short interpregnancy intervals (IPI < 6 months) following a multifetal pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of women with an index multifetal delivery and a subsequent singleton gestation between 2005 and 2021. The obstetrical outcomes of pregnancies following short IPI (<6 months) were compared to those with an IPI of 18-48 months. Additional analyses were also conducted for the other IPI groups: 7-17 months, and longer than 49 months, while women with an IPI of 18-48 months served as the reference group. The primary outcome was preterm birth (<37 weeks) rate. Secondary outcomes were other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 2514 women had a primary multifetal delivery with a subsequent singleton gestation at our medical centers; 160 (6.4%) had a short IPI, and 1142 (45.4%) had an optimal IPI. Women with a singleton gestation following a short IPI were younger, with lower rates of previous cesarean and fertility treatments. Women in the short IPI group had significantly higher rates of preterm birth <37 weeks, anemia (Hb < 11 gr%) on admission to the delivery room, and placental abruption. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that short IPI is associated with an increased risk for preterm birth (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.12-5.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Short IPI following a multifetal gestation is associated with an increased risk for preterm birth in subsequent singleton pregnancy.

12.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(7): 1529-1539, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36592172

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pregnancy and mode of delivery have a major effect on pelvic floor disorders (PFD). Assessing knowledge regarding PFD is essential not only for making more informed decisions regarding mode of delivery, but also for seeking help when PFD appear. The Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ) is a validated tool that assesses women's knowledge regarding urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Validation of the Arabic version of the PIKQ had never been carried out. The purpose of this study was to conduct a condition specific validation among parturients of the PIKQ in the Arabic language. METHODS: Translation of the PIKQ to the Arabic language was carried out according to international recommended guidelines. A cross-sectional study of pregnant women was conducted from June to September 2020 at the Soroka University Medical Center, Israel. The recommended 10:1 ratio between the number of subjects and the number of items in the questionnaire (n=24) was maintained. A total of 244 third trimester pregnant women have completed the Arabic version of the PIKQ. In addition to the validation of the psychometric characteristics, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability were tested as well. RESULTS: Initially, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted, resulting in two 12-item scales representing UI and POP. Then, to validate the scale construct we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results of the CFA demonstrated that the PIKQ displayed construct validity, with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.30 to 0.62. Finally, Cronbach's alpha indicated a good internal reliability for the two factors UI and POP. Criterion validity further supported the validity of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The Arabic version of the PIKQ is a new, reliable, consistent, and valid instrument to examine the level of knowledge regarding UI and POP in Arabic speaking pregnant women. This instrument may be used to assess women's knowledge about PFD and to direct the need for educational interventions that may empower women to make informed decisions regarding perinatal care.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor Disorders , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Urinary Incontinence , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Cross-Sectional Studies , Language , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; : 101209, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trial of labor after cesarean after 2 cesarean deliveries is linked to a lower success rate of vaginal delivery and higher rates of adverse obstetrical outcomes than trial of labor after cesarean after 1 previous cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean among women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included all women with singleton pregnancies attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries between 2003 and 2021. This study compared labor, maternal, and neonatal characteristics between women with failed trial of labor after cesarean and those with successful trial of labor after cesarean. Univariate analysis was initially performed, followed by multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: The study included a total of 1181 women attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries. Among these cases, vaginal birth after cesarean was achieved in 973 women (82.4%). Women with failed trial of labor after cesarean had higher rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities. Several factors were found to be associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean, including longer interpregnancy and interdelivery intervals, lower gravidity and parity, lower rates of previous successful vaginal delivery, smoking, earlier gestational age at delivery (38.3±2.1 vs 39.5±1.3 weeks), late preterm delivery (34-37 weeks of gestation), lower cervical dilation on admission, no use of epidural, and smaller neonatal birthweight. Our multivariable model revealed that late preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-10.47) and cervical dilation on admission for labor <3 cm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.54) were associated with higher odds of failed trial of labor after cesarean. CONCLUSION: In the investigated population of women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries undergoing trial of labor after cesarean, admission at the late preterm period with a cervical dilation of <3 cm, which reflects the latent phase, may elevate the risk of failed trial of labor after cesarean and a repeated intrapartum cesarean delivery.

14.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 278: 183-188, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36208525

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, delivery of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn is associated with various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, yet data regarding LGA in twin pregnancies is scarce. We aimed at evaluating maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with LGA presenting twin. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective computerized database study in two university-affiliated obstetrical centers, between 2005 and 2021. Parturients with di-amniotic twin pregnancy who had a trial of vaginal delivery were included. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of parturients with LGA presenting twin were compared to parturients with non-LGA presenting twin. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,491 parturients with twin pregnancies were found eligible, of those 287 (11.5%) had LGA presenting twin. Parturients with LGA presenting twin were of higher gravidity and parity, had higher rates of previous cesarean deliveries and diabetes (pre-gestational & gestational). Mode of delivery of both presenting and second twin did not differ between the study groups. Maternal outcomes were comparable, specifically, rates of shoulder dystocia, and postpartum hemorrhage did not differ. Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups other than a single case of clavicular fracture and a single case of encephalopathy in the group of LGA presenting twin. CONCLUSION: In our study, delivery of LGA presenting twin was found safe to both, mother and neonate. Our findings provide reassurance regarding the safety of vaginal labor in this specific population and should be presented during counseling prior to twins' delivery.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Twin , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Gestational Age , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Maternal Age
15.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 276: 185-190, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35930813

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with twin pregnancies following a short interpregnancy interval (IPI < 6 months). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective computerized database study in a single tertiary medical center between 2005 and 2021. Women who had an index singleton delivery and a subsequent twin gestation in their next pregnancy at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center (SZMC) were included. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies following a short IPI (<6 months) were compared to those with an optimal IPI (18-48 months). Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,079 women had an index singleton delivery followed by a twin gestation in their next pregnancy recorded at our medical center; 116 (5.9 %) had a history of short IPI, and 1,057 (50.8 %) had a history of optimal IPI. Women with a history of short IPI had higher rates of preterm labor < 37 weeks and < 34 weeks, NICU admissions and prolonged hospital stay of the first and second fetuses, mechanical ventilation of the first fetus, 1 and 5 Minute Apgar score lower than 7 of the second fetus and lower rates of elective cesarean delivery. An adjusted multivariate analysis showed that a history of short IPI was not an independent risk factor for preterm birth either < 34 weeks or < 37 weeks or for composite adverse neonatal outcome of the first and second twin. CONCLUSION: Twin pregnancy following a short IPI was not associated with neither preterm labor nor composite adverse neonatal outcome.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Twin , Premature Birth , Birth Intervals , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Retrospective Studies
16.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(12): 3407-3414, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35588318

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to examine knowledge regarding pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) among women during the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a large teaching medical center in Israel between June and September 2020. Women in their third trimester (N = 649) were asked to complete the validated Hebrew and Arabic versions of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ). The PIKQ instrument examines the knowledge of two major PFDs: urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The study population included women over 18 years of age, in the third trimester, who speak and read Hebrew or Arabic fluently. Two separate scores were calculated, one for each section of the PIKQ. The association of questionnaire scores with the different independent variables was examined using Student's t test or one-way ANOVA. Correlations were examined using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The Hebrew version was filled out by 405 women, and 244 women completed the Arabic version. The average questionnaire scores were 7.65 ± 2.8 and 5.32 ± 2 for the UI and POP sections respectively. Significantly higher average scores in both the UI and the POP sections were noted among health care workers (UI: 10.19 ± 2.3 vs 7.34 ± 2.6, p < 0.001; POP: 8.27 ± 2.7 vs 4.97 ± 2.6, p < 0.001), women with higher education (p < 0.001 in both parts) and those with higher incomes (p < 0.001 for both parts). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of PFD among women in the third trimester of pregnancy in Israel was found to be low. Founding educational programs for targeted groups may improve both the knowledge of PFD and the quality of life for these women.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor Disorders , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Urinary Incontinence , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(11): 3123-3128, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088091

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pregnancy and delivery have a major effect on pelvic floor disorders. Assessing knowledge regarding pelvic floor disorders in childbearing age women and appropriate interventions will enable women to seek appropriate medical advice once pelvic floor disorders have developed. The purpose of this study was to validate the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire in the Hebrew language. METHODS: Translation of the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire to the Hebrew language according to international recommended guidelines. A study was conducted to validate the questionnaire. The study took place between June to September 2020 in a tertiary medical center in Israel. A total of 240 third trimester pregnant women completed the Hebrew version of the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire. Construct validity, criterion validity and reliability tests were performed. RESULTS: Factor analysis of the Hebrew version of the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire demonstrated 12 strong positive factor loadings to one principal factor in the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire-pelvic organ prolapse domain (FL > 0.3) and 10/12 in the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire-urinary incontinence domain. The Hebrew prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire was found to have internal consistency, with Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.745 for the urinary incontinence domain and 0.796 for the pelvic organ prolapse domain. CONCLUSIONS: The Hebrew version of the prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire is a new, reliable, consistent, and valid instrument to examine the level of knowledge regarding pelvic floor disorders in Hebrew-speaking pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor Disorders , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Urinary Incontinence , Female , Humans , Language , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis
18.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 264: 299-305, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34358877

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with recurrent short interpregnancy interval (IPI) in women in their third delivery. METHODS: A retrospective computerized database study of all women who delivered their first three consecutive deliveries in a single tertiary medical center over 20 years (1999-2019). Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with recurrent short IPI (<6 months between the 1st and 2nd pregnancy and the 2nd and 3rd pregnancy) were compared to women with recurrent optimal IPI (18-48 months), and to women with a single short IPI (<6 months between the 1st and 2nd pregnancy followed by an optimal IPI of 18-48 months between the 2nd and 3rd pregnancy). Additionally, in the recurrent short IPI groups, outcomes of the 2nd and 3rd pregnancies were compared in order to achieve an ideal adjustment to background characteristics. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period 10,569 women had three consecutive deliveries at our medical center, of those 338 (3.2%) women had recurrent short IPIs, and 1,021 (9.7%) had recurrent optimal IPIs. Recurrent short IPI was associated with a significantly higher risk of maternal anemia (Hb < 10gr%) on admission to labor (aOR 3.4 [95% CI 1.09-10.65], p = 0.04) and higher risk of small for gestational age neonates (aOR 10.4 [95% CI 2.32-46.93], p < 0.01), as compared with women with recurrent optimal IPI and significantly higher rates of low neonatal birth weights (2500 gr) and anemia (Hb < 10gr%) alongside lower rates of operative vaginal deliveries as compared with women with single short IPI followed by an optimal IPI. In the recurrent short IPI groups, the 3rd deliveries had significantly higher rates of in-labor cesarean and anemia (Hb < 10gr%) on admission as compared to their 2nd deliveries. CONCLUSION: Recurrent short IPI is associated with maternal anemia and small for gestational age neonates. Guiding patients towards prolongation of the IPI should include explanatory comments on these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Birth Intervals , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...